Thank you for visiting our website

Featuring breaking political news and commentary on local, state, and national issues.

Showing posts with label Alderman Michael O'connor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alderman Michael O'connor. Show all posts

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Mayor and Board Sworn in Today

George Wenschhof

Randy McClement
The inauguration ceremony for the 61st administration of The City of Frederick takes place today.

The Weinberg Center will host the public event.  At 11:00 AM, Mayor Randy McClement (R) will be sworn in to serve his second term.  The board of aldermen will be consist of two Democrats who will enter their second terms; Kelly Russell and Michael O'Connor.

Joining them on the board will be newcomers; Phil Dacey (R), Josh Bokee (D) and former three term Democratic alderman Donna Kuzemchak.

It is expected Kelly Russell, who received the most votes in the election, will be made Mayor Pro Tem today.

Democrats, will once again hold a super majority on the board of alderman, while a Republican serves as mayor of a city that has a strong Democratic voter registration advantage.

Republican alderman elect Phil Dacey will be facing voter anger to the robo-calls made on behalf of his campaign that criticized Democratic alderman elect Donna Kuzemchak for failing to pay her property taxes on time.  Dacey has yet to comment on the issue.

Kuzemchak, once research has been done, may be setting a record for serving the most number of terms as alderman, when she serves her fourth term on the board.

She told me, when the seating arrangement was being set for the board of alderman, she requested a seat next to Dacey.

Stay tuned.

---

Please donate today to Frederick Politics by clicking on a Donation Button in the right hand margin of page - Thank You! 

Friday, November 8, 2013

Kudos to Mayor and Board for Closing Campaign Finance Loophole

George Wenschhof

Last night, during The City of Frederick mayor and board meeting, they passed an amendment to close the loophole that allowed individuals who also control entities to exceed the amount of campaign contributions allowed under the law.

The vote was 4-0 was alderman Shelley Aloi (R) abstaining.  The law will go into effect December 6, 2013.

Under the law, mayoral candidates are allowed contributions up to $2,500 and alderman candidates $1,000.

I was the first to report, after the candidates had filed their first campaign finance report on August 12, that Democratic mayoral candidate Galen Clagett had received a total of $30,000 from entities controlled by two people and that Democratic mayoral candidate Karen Young had received $7,500 via entitles controlled by one person.

This had been done legally by using multiple LLC’s with donations from each not exceeding the $2,500 limit.
 
Realizing, a law could not be passed in time to impact the remainder of the election, I asked candidates to pledge to not accept donations that exceeded "the intent or spirit of the law".
 
All of the candidates responded and agreed, with only Republican alderman candidate Katie Nash providing a convoluted and confusing answer to my question.
 
The city moved quickly to address these concerns and during a mayor and board workshop held on October 9, agreed the "loophole" should be closed. City attorney Rachel Depo presented them with a proposal modeled after a recently passed state of Maryland campaign finance law.
 
After, reviewing the law, I recommended a change in the definition of what constitutes a contribution from one contributor in Sec. 7-22. Limit on contributions. (d) (ii) which read "the business entities are owned or controlled by at least 80% of the same individuals or business entities.

In a conversation with assistant city attorney Rachel Depo, she informed me the state committee had recommended 50% and it evidently had been changed to 80% by the state legislature. 
 
In a column published on October 13, I expressed my hope the city would go with the 50% level to further restrict influence by a single contributor.
 
Last night, Democratic alderman Michael O'Connor made the motion, that passed 4-0, to approve the proposal presented by the city attorney with a change to "business entities owned or controlled by at least 51% of the same individuals or business entities.
 
The mayor and board should be commended for moving quickly to close this campaign finance loophole.
 
---
 
Please donate today to Frederick Politics by clicking on a Donation Button in the right hand margin of page - Thank You!

Friday, November 1, 2013

Who Will Win Alderman Race?

George Wenschhof

Trying to predict the five winners from ten candidates who will serve on The City of Frederick board of alderman is always difficult.

Sadly, when voters are asked to pick candidates to fill multiple slots, under votes often occur.  What happens is a voter has one or two, maybe three candidates they have made up their mind to vote for on Election Day.

Afterward, they either vote party ticket, a familiar name to fill up their five votes, or they simply choose not to exercise their right to vote, in this case, for five candidates.

The other tricky maneuver utilized by some candidates is to tell their close supporters to single-shot or bullet vote, meaning just vote for them.

The general consensus I am hearing and one I agree with is incumbent Democratic aldermen Michael O’Connor and Kelly Russell will be reelected.  They have both performed well in their first term in office and deserve another four years.

The next name I hear most often from voters from both sides of the aisle is Democrat Josh Bokee.  Bokee ran for alderman in the 2009 election and fell short. He stayed involved in city politics serving on the city planning commission.  His time on the planning commission earned him further respect so look to see him also be elected.

In what is expected to be another low voter turnout election and with the likely high number of under votes, the next two slots will be closely contested.

Democrats John Daniels and Donna Kuzemchak have experience and knowledge of city hall and would serve the voters well as aldermen.

Daniels has the demeanor and familiarity with city hall to enable him to be one of the most effective aldermen on the board.  He will add reasonable and thoughtful decision making to the board of aldermen.

He has been campaigning hard and with the help of former Democratic sixth district congressional candidate Don DeArmon, Daniels is be a favorite to fill out one of the next two slots on the board.

Donna, a former three term alderman, has been much more energized in this campaign, following her loss in 2009 and will also be in the mix to complete the five member board of aldermen.

The only experienced Republican candidate is former one term alderman Alan Imhoff.  He has name recognition from having run for office on numerous occasions and also having served on many city committees.

Recognizing, he is in the mix, he is going door-to-door to meet with voters, not something he has been known to do in the past.

Phil Dacey raised the most money out of the aldermen candidates, but most of the donations came from outside of the city so it is hard to project what this will mean in votes.  He does have many campaign signs and spent his campaign funds on glossy mailers, three of which were received at my home on the same day.  He also was the only candidate to pay folks to go door to door for him.  His connections to ultra right conservative former state senator Alex Mooney may hurt him in the city election.  However, his money raised will make him competitive for one of the remaining seats on the board.

The most often description and criticism I have heard in regard to Katie Nash is she is a grandstander, one who will drop the sensational headline to get attention, but one who had little substance or knowledge of the issue she was highlighting.

Her signs depict her last name, the same as popular former Democratic alderman and current planning commission member; Meta Nash.  There is no relation, but sadly some voters will think they are casting their ballot for Meta or a relative of Meta.

Dave Schmidt and Daniel Cowell campaigned hard in their first entry into a political election. However, I believe they will both fall short.

It is very likely Democrats will maintain a majority on the board and a strong possibility this election will be a clean sweep by Democratic candidates.

Stay tuned.

Make sure you vote on November 5.
 
---
 
Donate today to Frederick Politics by clicking on a Donation Button in the right hand margin of page - Thank You!

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Young Heavy Handed with City Alderman over Proposed Citizens/Montevue Sale

George Wenschhof

Blaine Young
The proposed sale of Citizens Care and Rehabilitation Center and Montevue Assisted Living, already beset with legal questions surrounding deed restrictions on a sale, has now entered a new contentious stage.

In a strongly worded official letter, dated June 11, 2013, Frederick Board of Commissioners President Blaine Young (R), used strong language when addressing the members of The City of Frederick board of aldermen, who oppose the sale of the Citizens/Montevue complex.

Young points out in the letter the county has assisted the city in numerous projects over the years and asks for the aldermen whom oppose the sale if they will agree to provide city funds for half of the projected annual $6 million loss the county has been spending to supplement the facilities.  The full text of the letter can be read here.

When I asked Mayor Randy McClement (R) his response to Young’s letter, he sent me an email saying “The BOA at the Wednesday June 12th Workshop, requested that this topic be placed on a future workshop for discussion. I am working to schedule that workshop."

Democratic alderman Michael O’Connor responded to my inquiry by saying “City taxpayers are county taxpayers, so the residents of the City of Frederick are already participants in the support of Citizens and Montevue, which I think is appropriate.
 
O’Connor added “the City has not taken a formal position on the proposed sale, but I do not believe the action a majority of the Board of County Commissioners appears determined to follow through with is in the best interest of our community, the citizens (of the City and county) who call these facilities home, those who may need this care in the future, and the legacy of all the past volunteers and residents.”
 
Young did not respond to a phone call or text message prior to publication. What is unknown is whether a vote was taken by the Board of County Commissioners supporting this letter being sent to the city or whether Young acted unilaterally.

The Frederick Board of Commissioners have set a June 25 public hearing where they will decide whether to move forward with the sale and if they will disband the board of trustees who oversee the facilities.

A July 9 Frederick News Post editorial, says in part, “Both measures need to be tabled. 
This is a complex issue that encompasses not only moral and historical elements, but also legal ones.

The trustee’s board has asked the Maryland attorney general’s Office for a formal opinion on the legality of the sale.  We hope the office will also weigh in on the commissioner’s move to remove the trustees board.  This is an area of state law the county’s own attorney noted as vague and could lead to a legal challenge.”  I agree.

On Friday June 14 at 1:00 PM ET, the League of Women Voters of Frederick County will host an informative discussion of the financial analysis of selling the Citizens and Montevue facilities.

It will be held in downtown Frederick at the C. Burr Artz Library Community Room, located on the first floor.  For more information, click here.

Plan to attend.

---

Donations to Frederick Politics are Appreciated - Click on the Donation Button in right hand margin of page - Thank You!