Thank you for visiting our website

Featuring breaking political news and commentary on local, state, and national issues.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

OBAMACARE MAY HAVE SAVED MY LIFE

George Wenschhof
Observing what is best described as a world beset with violence and upheaval ranging from a flare up of the Israel-Hamas ongoing struggle in Gaza, President Obama authorizing U.S. airstrikes in Iraq, a rekindling of the cold war with Russia with the Ukraine conflict, and the continuation of a do nothing Congress, I placed my political commentary on hold.
Instead of focusing on the outcome of the midterm elections and whether Republicans or Democrats will hold a majority in the House and Senate, my focus has been on what comes next in a life threatening experience.
Receiving the news from my gastroenterologist three weeks ago that I have a cancerous lesion on my sigmoid colon was a jolt.
Fearing anesthesia and upon learning propofol (the drug that contributed to the death of Michael Jackson) was being used, I elected to stay awake during the colonoscopy, watching on a monitor and speaking with the doctor during the procedure.
I saw he was not pleased when he discovered a lesion, took biopsies of it and then tattooed the area with a dye so a surgeon could easily locate it later.  The news from the pathology report two days later that it was cancerous was not a surprise.
The exhausting days that followed have passed quickly, spent in gathering information, selecting a surgeon and a surgery date.
Adding more intrigue was a subsequent CT-Scan. Originally ordered for the abdomen and pelvic areas and later, per a surgeon’s request, expanded to include the chest.  The scan revealed a nodule on the left main stem bronchus. A bronchoscopy is up next to be followed by another biopsy necessary to determine the nature of this nodule.
What allowed me to receive this medical care was the passage of The Affordable Care Act.  If I did not have this coverage, my diagnosis would not have been made and the subsequent treatment would not be available to me.
Bad business decisions combined with the lead up to the 2008 major downturn in the economy led to the closing of my real estate company that I operated for 16 years.
Since then, I intentionally pursued full time, my lifelong interest in politics by writing news and commentary. While the outcome of advocating for legislative policy and endorsing elected officials has been a mixed bag filled with successes and disappointments along the way, my fascination with politics has never waned.
The personal financial reward of my efforts over the last six years has been a meager and often day to day existence of an aspiring, yet struggling writer/advocate. This downward spiral spinning me into a world previously foreign to me, filled with multiple culture clashes and what is defined as homelessness.
My current attempt as editor/publisher/moderator of a subscription based online political news and commentary video Blog bombed with my owing more than I earned.
In spite of my homelessness, no automobile and no capital, among the recent video interviews I was able to produce and moderate were with the next Attorney General of Maryland Brian Frosh, Montgomery County executive Ike Leggett, Frederick County circuit court judge Danny O’Connor, and Frederick County executive candidate Jan Gardner.
Pride holding me back from pursuing public assistance and eventually without an automobile, I find myself often without resources to afford the basic necessities of food and shelter.
On March 31 of this year, the last day for enrollment for immediate eligibility under The Affordable Care Act, I went online, navigated successfully through the application process and submitted.
Following acceptance, I eventually visited my primary care physician.  A blood workup and stool sample followed, leading to my first colonoscopy at the age of 61, a full eleven years after the medical community recommends it be done.
The passage of The Affordable Care Act early on in the first term of President Obama’s administration brought about both disdain and enthusiastic support from Americans across the country.
Those who opposed the passage quickly labeled the legislation “Obamacare” and Republicans in Congress used it to galvanize support from voters. Republicans also used it as an excuse to oppose any and all legislation proposed by President Obama.
The supporters pointing out the U.S. was the only major developed country in the world that did not provide national healthcare.
The result following passage of the legislation has been a gridlocked and dysfunctional government destined to be recorded as the worst congressional session in history.
Some who have helped me over the last six years have often been those who have the least ability to do so.  Living at a zero income level, I quickly discovered others who exist in what is best explained as an underground economy.
It will take a book to describe the last six years in detail.  A book I hope I am able to write.
The American debate will surely continue on whether government healthcare should be provided and for whom.
For me, I am grateful.  With a mixture of fear, hope and a strong belief in God, I embark on the next adventure in my life.
Never actualizing that it may benefit me, I have always been a supporter of The Affordable Care Act and strongly believe a single payer healthcare system is what should eventually evolve.
Without it, any middle class working family not covered with healthcare that experienced a major medical emergency would quickly reach financial ruin.
My desire is to aid in stimulating a positive dialogue that results in a healthcare system for all that is even better than what exists today and the implementation of a more effective, comprehensive approach to combat homelessness.
Finally, if you are over 50, go have a colonoscopy done.  It may save your life.
Stay tuned.

Monday, July 7, 2014

WHO WILL WIN FIRST FREDERICK COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND COUNCIL ELECTION?

George Wenschhof
The switch to charter government has done little to alter the over two decade long battle over how best to handle growth in Frederick County, Maryland.
Frederick County voters are faced once again with choosing between these two sides when they vote for members of the new county council and county executive.
While they are certainly nuances to the two sides, they are often described and recognized as “pro-growth” or “no-growth”.
Political affiliation does not define the members of the two groups.
In the 2006 county commissioner election, Democrats Jan Gardner and Kai Hagen ran with Republicans John “Lennie” Thompson and David Gray to form what they referred to as the “Dream Team”.  They won that election and served one term.
In that election, Democrats were unable to field a full slate of candidates for commissioner because they were not in agreement on this issue.  A third Democratic candidate Richard Floyd ran with the Dream Team but lost.  The fourth Democratic candidate Ron Wolf did not run with this slate and also lost.
This alliance over growth issues illustrates the age old phrase “politics makes strange bedfellows”.  Republican Commissioner Thompson told me once that although he was in alignment with Democratic Commissioner Gardner on growth, he believed with Blaine Young on less government and less taxes.
Another example is an overwhelming majority of Democrats support The Affordable Care Act. Yet, Democratic candidate for county executive Jan Gardner welcomes the support given her by Residents Against Landsdale Expansion (RALE) president Steve McKay.  Steve McKay is an unaffiliated voter who opposes The Affordable Care Act.
In the 2010 election the Kai Hagen, Ellis Burrus and Janet Wiles ran together on a more managed growth slate for county commissioner and lost handily to Republican Blaine Young and his team of “open for business” Republicans Billy Shreve, Kirby Delauter, and tag along Paul Smith.
Another Democratic candidate Michael Kurtianyck was not included in the Kai team and Democratic candidate Linda Norris attempted to stay away from the Kai slate.  They both would also lose.
Former Commissioners Kai Hagen and Jan Gardner argued strongly on opposite sides of the incinerator issue during the one term they served together.  They both wrote a series of columns that appeared on my Blog with Jan arguing for the incinerator to be built and Kai arguing against it.
Today, because of their agreement on growth policy, those differences have been forgotten with Kai supporting Jan in her run for county executive.
The growth pendulum was swinging again when all five Democratic candidates for county commissioner lost in the 2010 election.  Frederick County Democratic candidates fared poorly in that election with only 2 Democrats elected in over 20 Frederick County positions on the ballot.  They were long time Democratic political leaders Ron Young (state senate district 3) and Galen Clagett (state delegate district 3-A).
Do not look to see Clagett support Jan Gardner for county executive. In the 2013 City of Frederick election, Clagett, after losing to Karen Young in the Democratic primary for mayor, endorsed incumbent Republican mayor Randy McClement, who went on to win reelection.
In this 2014 county executive race Jan Gardner cleared the way for an unopposed primary and encouraged former “Dream Team” member commissioner David Gray to run against Blaine Young in the Republican primary.  Her thoughts were this would damage him among the “no-growth” Republican voters and cause him to spend campaign funds. Blaine’s short lived campaign for governor had produced a flush campaign chest.
Two well qualified and well known Democratic businessmen, Earl Robbins and Gordon Cooley considered a run for county executive and decided against it.  Both are more moderate when it comes to growth issues than Jan Gardner, but understood they would have a tough battle against Gardner in the Democratic primary when fewer voters cast their ballots and those voters tend to be more progressive.
To no one’s surprise, following David Gray’s expected loss to Blaine Young in the Republican primary, Gray endorsed Democrat Jan Gardner for county executive.
It would not be startling to see Democratic state delegate Galen Clagett endorse Republican Blaine Young for county executive.
So, the growth issue continues to be paramount in the county executive and county council race.
Prior to the 2014 election, voters decided, by referendum, to change to charter government. They will be electing a county executive and a seven member county council. Two of the council members are elected at large, similar to how previous commissioners were elected and five will be elected in single member districts.
Each voter will cast a ballot for a county executive, 2 at-large council members and 1 council member from their district.
Determining on what side of the growth issue each county executive candidate is on is easy on the long anticipated matchup between Jan Gardner(D) and Blaine Young(R).  This race should be tilted in favor of Gardner after many unpopular decisions by commissioner President Blaine Young. But do not underestimate the ability of Young to emerge victorious.
Open for business and pro-growth Republicans emerged from the primary with the Democratic candidates moving on to the general election being more difficult to clearly label.
The 2 at-large council member races will have Democrats Susan Reeder Jesse and Linda Norris facing Republicans Billy Shreve and Bud Otis.
Commissioner Shreve and Otis are easy to label as “open for business”. However, it will be hard to place a no-growth label on Norris and Reeder-Jesse. They have crossover appeal and in a county that features a majority of Republican voter registration, look for both to be competitive.  In addition, Susan is the daughter of former Democratic commissioner Bruce Reeder, who was considered business friendly during his time in office.
Shreve and Otis are the early favorites in this election because of a Republican voter registration advantage.  However, who wins the county executive race will influence who wins these two seats on the council.  If Jan Gardner wins convincingly against Blaine Young, don’t be surprised if one or both of the Democratic women candidates win.  Conversely, if Blaine Young wins, both Shreve and Otis could end up on the council.
In district 1, Democrat Jerry Donald faces Republican Ellen Bartlett.  Numerous sources told me Bartlett came across poorly in candidate forums in the primary, but look to see her win this election.  Her win will be primarily due to last name recognition of her husband who served in congress for two decades.
In district 2, the race is between Democrat Annette Breiling and Republican Tony Chmelik.  Breiling, like her Democratic counterpart Donald in district 1, is surely the better candidate.  However, look to see Chmelik win.
Both Chmelik and Bartlett would go in the pro-growth category.
District 3 has Democrat M.C. Keegan Ayer against Republican Denny Shafer.  Shafer campaigned with Young in the primary, but look to see M.C. Ayer win this seat on the council.
District 4 features Democrat Jessica Fitzwater against Republican Bob Lawrence.  Fitzwater is new to politics and still has a lot to learn about county government, but will win in this district that has a majority of Democratic voters.
Finally, in District 5 it is Democrat Mark Long against Republican and current commissioner Kirby Delauter.  Democrats believe Delauter is vulnerable and Long will win this seat.  Look to see Delauter win this seat, primarily a result of a Republican voter registration advantage.
I have Democrats winning in district 3 and 4 and Republicans winning in district 1, 2 and 5.
Democrats could win a majority of seats on the council if they win both at-large seats.  This could happen with a convincing win by Jan Gardner.  Due to Republican voter registration advantage in the county, the more likely scenario is for one Democratic and one Republican to be elected in the at-large seats.
If Gardner wins, the council make up would most likely be a 4-3 Republican advantage.
On the other hand, if Blaine Young wins, the council make up could be 5-2 Republican.
The majority on the council will likely be “pro-growth” regardless of who wins for county executive.
Voters will have the final say when they weigh in on Tuesday November 4.
Stay tuned.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

LOW VOTER TURNOUT STORY IN MARYLAND ELECTION

George Wenschhof
When the absentee ballots are finally counted, the primary turnout in Maryland will fall way short of what I had predicted to be a low 35%.  Sadly, it was common to see lots of campaign signs at polling locations and few voters.
The move of the primary date from September to June surely impacted turnout.  But, as I pointed out in my column Monday, the ongoing gerrymandering of districts of the political party in power, the unregulated amount of money in politics and the difficult process for a viable third party to become established, all play a significant part in voter apathy and their lost of trust in government.
There were no big surprises across the state with Lt. Governor Anthony Brown winning the Democratic nomination for governor of the state.  He will face Republican Larry Hogan as he campaigns to become the first African American governor of Maryland and the third in the nation.
The good news for Brown is both of his opponents; state delegate Heather Mizeur and Attorney General Doug Gansler spoke in their concession speeches how they will help ensure a victory for Brown in November.
It would be wise for the Brown campaign to find a prominent role for both to play in the general election and if successful in November, a position in his administration.
State senator Brian Frosh, the most experienced and qualified candidate, came from behind in early polling to convincingly win the Democratic nod for Attorney General.
Likeable and effective Democratic state Comptroller Peter Franchot, who decided against a run for Governor, will be favored to win easily in November.  One of the three members of the state’s powerful Board of Public Works, he is known to speak his mind, especially when it comes to spending taxpayer money effectively.
In one unexpected result, Senate minority leader David Brinkley (R-district 4) was crushed by state delegate Michael Hough.  Hough, who received 68% of the vote, used the tea party playbook of negative campaigning, primarily accusing Brinkley of not being a conservative.
Hough will face a spirited battle from Democrat Dan Rupli in the general election, but Rupli will need help from disgruntled Brinkley supporters in the district that has a heavy Republican voter registration.
Ike Leggett beat back a challenge for former county executive Doug Duncan with a 45% – 32% win in the Democratic primary in his bid to continue as county executive.  Leggett is heavily favored to win in November.
State delegate Tom Hucker(D) leads by 217 votes over Evan Glass(D) in the Democratic District 5 Montgomery County council primary.  Hucker should withstand absentee counting to win that contest.
In Frederick County, voters had their first opportunity to vote for county executive and county council as they move to implement charter government.
Incumbent Frederick board of county commissioners president Blaine Young (R) narrowly won the Republican primary with 53%, despite his campaign spending heavily against two candidates; David Gray and Mark Sweadner, who did little campaigning and spent little money.
This sets up the anticipated battle between Democrat Jan Gardner and Blaine Young over who will become the first executive for Frederick County.
If, past numbers are a reliable guide, look to see voter turnout in November exceed 60%.
Stay tuned.

Monday, June 23, 2014

INCREASING VOTER TURNOUT AND RESTORING DEMOCRACY

George Wenschhof
After a week of early voting opportunity, Maryland voters have one last chance to cast their ballot on Tuesday June 24.  Polls across the state will be open from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM.
Unfortunately, apathy continues to prevail and the anticipated turnout is expected to be low.  If, I were a betting man, I would predict a turnout around 35%.
Why turnout is expected to be low is an important discussion and one that needs to happen, not just in Maryland, but across the country.
In Maryland, the moving of the primary date from early September to June, after school is out will be questioned.
However, looking at past primary turnout in Maryland reveals a less than 40% turnout is commonplace.
In light of a full week of early voting with multiple polling locations statewide, if low turnout does result, a more in depth review must take place.
Underlying low turnout in America is likely the result of an overall distrust in government.
State legislatures, dominated by Republicans or Democrats have been gerrymandering districts to favor their respective party for decades.
The resulting “safe” seat ensures their party is represented in state legislatures and in congress.
Often, the low turnout in primaries is heavily made up of engaged activists who are motivated to vote.
These small number of progressive or conservative activists determine the winner in the primary and with the seat considered “safe” that candidate often goes on to win the general election.
The result has been a gridlocked and polarized congress with elected Democrats and Republicans strongly infused with ideology.
Absent today in Congress, is the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), a pragmatic group of representatives that were strong when President Bill Clinton was in office.  It was the DLC along with the shrewdness of Clinton, who helped move his agenda forward in a Republican congress.
The strategy used by many presidential candidates to run in the primary to the left if you are a Democrat and run to the right if you are a Republican with the candidates then delicately moving closer to the center as they campaign in the general election, when more voters weigh in, has become commonplace.
Today, restoring belief and faith in government is paramount to restoring democracy.
One step toward restoring faith would be to end politicians determining their voters.  Nonpartisan committees should be established by legislatures in all states across the country to determine redistricting, if called for by the census.
Another signal of the distrust in government is the fastest growing segment of voters across the country is unaffiliated voters.
This has been going on for some time now, yet a viable third party, prevalent in most other representative democracies across the world, is unable to take hold in the United States.
Making it easier for a third party to become established should be examined seriously with recommendations implemented.
The staggering amount of money in politics is the third area that must be addressed.  Political committees, emboldened by recent Supreme Court decisions are pumping unprecedented sums of money into races all over the country.
The ability of those with wealth to have more influence on an election than those who are poor, tears at the very core of democracy, where one vote should not be more powerful than another.
History teaches us representative democracy is not easy and will often be tested.  However, the U.S. constitution fortunately offers the best framework for representative democracy that exists today.
Working within that framework to restore trust and belief in voters is also vital.
Establishing nonpartisan committees to handle redistricting in states across the country, providing an easier path to establish a viable third party and getting the money out of politics would be an excellent start at restoring trust.
Maybe then, voters would begin electing leaders who are able to bring Americans together to develop a shared vision and sustainable future for local communities and the country.
Stay tuned.